Check out this nice little infoviz by Ezra Klein at The Washington Post, which illustrates the the new findings of a congressional panel:

A Republican plan to extend tax cuts for the rich would add more than $36 billion to the federal deficit next year -- and transfer the bulk of that cash into the pockets of the nation's millionaires, according to a [nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation] analysis released Wednesday.

Via.

Paul is in Washington DC this week, on some top-secret DLB business. Hope to tell you all about it soon.

In the meantime, here are a couple of pictures from him at Tuesday's Inauguration:

For my money, we've learned a lot thinking about promising in advertising. We've learned that you while you can't promise something you can't deliver, a lot of companies try to circumvent reality by promising almost nothing, insinuating anything and everything, promising something deeply vague, or adopting an ironic stance toward the whole promising practice in general. From a viewer's perspective, that's a whole lot of of sneakiness, and it leads to an ongoing state of consumer anxiety.

I'd like to talk briefly today about how we as designers, advertisers, and corporations, can address this problem, and why we should want to.

We consumers are jaded. That is part and parcel of living now, in the culture we live in. We've been lied to enough that we aren't willing to accept that. If that's the case, we should note, there's no reason to think that the practices of promising something minimal, irrelevant, vague, or indefinitely deferred can go on forever with our blessing either. On the contrary, the ironic stance we're adopting toward these promises (and their counterpart wild insinuations) seems to evidence that this paradigm is falling apart even more quickly than the last.

Read More...