How Much Do You Charge Now?
Like those long voice mail menus, are some cell phones designed to run up your wireless bill? The New York Times tech blog seems to think so.
In this NYT blog post, David Pogue discusses letters sent by readers regarding pricey data transmission fees. It seems that Verizon counts ANY amount of data sent from a phone as a full megabyte, which shows up on customers’ bills as a $1.99 charge. Not unexpected, but here’s the kicker:
“The phone is designed in such a way that you can almost never avoid getting $1.99 charge on the bill. Around the OK button on a typical flip phone are the up, down, left, right arrows. If you open the flip and accidentally press the up arrow key, you see that the phone starts to connect to the web. So you hit END right away. Well, too late. You will be charged $1.99 for that 0.02 kilobytes of data. NOT COOL. I’ve had phones for years, and I sometimes do that mistake to this day, as I’m sure you have. Legal, yes; ethical, NO.
For the record, I have accidentally clicked that button many times and quickly shut down the browser when I realized my mistake, but I don’t recall any charges showing up on my bill.
I will say this: It would seem to me that if there is a very easy solution to this problem. Presumably Verizon can tell which URL customers are trying to connect to. If someone receives only 0.02 kilobytes or whatever from Verizon’s address, they ought to ignore it as an error. This humane gesture would save them a bundle on customer service calls and data holds, not to mention reducing the number of angry blog posts out there.
As for the phone design conspiracy, my Verizon phone lets me reconfigure the button to something other than their web store. I just did. I realize many people don’t ever touch the settings on their phone, but at least it can be changed. It’s their phone, so you’d better believe they have the shortcuts configured for easy access to their most expensive services. Is that surprising to anyone?
I’m less inclined to believe this is an evil conspiracy, as the NYT post seems to promote, than an unfortunate confluence of corporate thinking. It’s not ethical, but it’s not a trap, either.
| Tagged with: | Business, Design Ethics, New York Times, Product Design, Verizon |
Post a comment
Want to know more?
You're reading BlogLESS, a thrice-weekly blog about the ethics of advertising, branding, design, social media and business. We are also fans of zen, although this itself is perhaps not so zen.



Trackbacks